Re: [exim-dev] [Bug 893] New: Not enough info in DSN ('retry…

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: 韓家標 Bill Hacker
Date:  
To: 893
CC: exim-dev
Subject: Re: [exim-dev] [Bug 893] New: Not enough info in DSN ('retry timeout exceeded')
Lena wrote:
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are on the CC list for the bug.
>
> http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=893
>            Summary: Not enough info in DSN ('retry timeout exceeded')
>            Product: Exim
>            Version: 4.68
>           Platform: All
>         OS/Version: All
>             Status: NEW
>           Severity: wishlist
>           Priority: low
>          Component: Delivery in general
>         AssignedTo: nigel@???
>         ReportedBy: Lena@???
>                 CC: exim-dev@???

>
>
> I haven't access to the log of my ISP's relay (Exim 4.68). All I get from it is
> DSN ("Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender"). Sometimes
> it says: "retry timeout exceeded". But why the message was deferred? An example
> of the log excerpt from another bug report:
>
> mainlog:2007-02-06 11:15:09 1HEVjT-0003wA-NJ
> inbound.hughes.net.cust.securehostedemail.com [64.97.131.1] Connection timed
> out
> mainlog:2007-02-06 11:15:09 1HEVjT-0003wA-NJ == xxxxx@??? R=lookuphost
> T=remote_smtp defer (110): Connection timed out
> mainlog:2007-02-06 11:15:09 1HEVjT-0003wA-NJ ** xxxx@???: retry timeout
> exceeded
>
> The DSN should include the for example "Connection timed out" from the last
> retry attempt in addition to the "retry timeout exceeded".
>
>


AFAIK, these are events that *may* be more widely separated in time and
causality than the same-second timestamp (above), ergo perhaps a 'non-trivial'
exercise to associate.

grep '1HEVjT-0003wA-NJ' ~/exim/mainlog

.. clearly associates the history, even if other entries were to be
interspersed, does it not?

JM2CW

Bill Hacker