On söndagen den 16 augusti 2009, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> On tisdagen den 30 juni 2009, Tom Kistner wrote:
> > Rick Cooper wrote:
> > > Is there any work being done, or a patch available, to allow signing
> > > both DKIM and DomainKeys without sending a message through exim twice?
> >
> > The situation right now is a bit confusing.
> >
> > I had added concurrent Domainkeys (via libdomainkeys) and DKIM (via
> > libdkim) signing support in CVS after the 4.69 release. That code was
> > never released, but some people run a snapshot of it.
> >
> > DKIM verification support was oddly implemented, and the library I used
> > had some limitations at that time. It also brought in additional
> > build-time dependencies (lstdc++, openssl).
> >
> > So I wrote my own DKIM implementation [1] which is dependency-free and
> > portable even to non-posix platforms like Windows. Similar to how pcre
> > was handled, a copy is included in the Exim source, so Exim can have
> > DKIM support by default on its supported platforms (I didn't try them
> > all of course ...).
>
> Oh. I guess I'll package it for Debian ASAP then.
Do you provide an official v1.0 tarball? If not, which commit is v1.0?
--
Magnus Holmgren holmgren@???
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
"Exim is better at being younger, whereas sendmail is better for
Scrabble (50 point bonus for clearing your rack)" -- Dave Evans
