Rick Cooper wrote:
> ----Original Message----
> From: exim-users-bounces@??? [mailto:exim-users-bounces@exim.org] On
> Behalf Of Renaud Allard Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 1:32 PM
> To: Peter Bowyer
> Cc: exim users; rcooper@???
> Subject: Re: [exim] DKIM and DomainKeys
>
>> On 6/29/09 4:54 PM, Peter Bowyer wrote:
>>> On 29/06/2009, Rick Cooper<rcooper@???> wrote:
>>>> Is there any work being done, or a patch available, to allow signing
>>>> both DKIM and DomainKeys without sending a message through exim twice?
>>> Last heard, Tom's DKIM patch is mutually exclusive with the Domainkeys
>>> functionality. I've asked about re-considering this for what I thought
>>> were obvious reasons.... he's busy with real work at the moment but
>>> will re-surface sometime soon I expect.
>>>
>> I am sucessfully signing all messages with both Domainkeys and DKIM
>> using an exim snapshot (post 4.69).
>
> Sorry, Didn't hit reply all, the first time
>
>
> I downloaded the latest snapshot, and I see no documentation as to the
> changes for the DKIM and DK support. I do see that EDITME no longer has
> either EXPERIMENTAL_ definitions and I see DKIM is compiled in unless
> un-defined. But it appears the EXPERIMENTAL_DOMAINKEYS section still needs
> to be in the Makefile? And what about the items such as dk_selector,
> $dk_domain and so forth? Are these now $dkim_domain and dkim_selector? That
> is how the code appears to be written, but I don't see anything relating to
> domainkeys... Does it just sign both ways?
>
> Any help you could give would be much appreciated
I believe the though line (which is listed in bug 376) goes along the
lines of - DomainKeys is depricated, DKIM is its replacement, let's move
swiftly towards that goal.
--
The Exim Manual
http://www.exim.org/docs.html
http://docs.exim.org/current/
