Re: [exim] DKIM and DomainKeys

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Rick Cooper
Date:  
To: 'exim users'
Subject: Re: [exim] DKIM and DomainKeys
----Original Message----
From: exim-users-bounces@??? [mailto:exim-users-bounces@exim.org] On
Behalf Of Renaud Allard Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 1:32 PM
To: Peter Bowyer
Cc: exim users; rcooper@???
Subject: Re: [exim] DKIM and DomainKeys

> On 6/29/09 4:54 PM, Peter Bowyer wrote:
>> On 29/06/2009, Rick Cooper<rcooper@???> wrote:
>>> Is there any work being done, or a patch available, to allow signing
>>> both DKIM and DomainKeys without sending a message through exim twice?
>>
>> Last heard, Tom's DKIM patch is mutually exclusive with the Domainkeys
>> functionality. I've asked about re-considering this for what I thought
>> were obvious reasons.... he's busy with real work at the moment but
>> will re-surface sometime soon I expect.
>>
>
> I am sucessfully signing all messages with both Domainkeys and DKIM
> using an exim snapshot (post 4.69).


Sorry, Didn't hit reply all, the first time


I downloaded the latest snapshot, and I see no documentation as to the
changes for the DKIM and DK support. I do see that EDITME no longer has
either EXPERIMENTAL_ definitions and I see DKIM is compiled in unless
un-defined. But it appears the EXPERIMENTAL_DOMAINKEYS section still needs
to be in the Makefile? And what about the items such as dk_selector,
$dk_domain and so forth? Are these now $dkim_domain and dkim_selector? That
is how the code appears to be written, but I don't see anything relating to
domainkeys... Does it just sign both ways?

Any help you could give would be much appreciated

Rick



--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.