On Wed, 20 May 2009, W B Hacker wrote:
>
> Until LBL'ed they were getting past just about everything here - SA included, so
> I'm more curious as to what required a whitelist than whether either of us agree
> the 'value' of their content.
>
The receiving MTA in this case is an outsourced
service, don't recall exact details of why the
cc items were blocked. The tech contact at the
recipient domain told me that needed mailings
were being blocked, so I whitelisted cc for them.
--
--------------------------------------------------------
Dave Lugo dlugo@??? LC Unit #260 TINLC
Have you hugged your firewall today? No spam, thanks.
--------------------------------------------------------
Are you the police? . . . . No ma'am, we're sysadmins.
