Re: [exim] Sender callout verification on BATV signed addres…

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Peter Bowyer
Date:  
To: exim users
Subject: Re: [exim] Sender callout verification on BATV signed addresses
On 14/05/2009, Dave Lugo <dlugo@???> wrote:
> On Thu, 14 May 2009, Peter Bowyer wrote:
> >
> > SPF doesn't stop someone sending forgeries, it enables a 3rd party to
> > opt not to receive them, and especially, not to bounce them to the
> > forged sender.
> >
> > A smart spammer might inspect the SPF records of a domain he was about
> > to forge and not forge a domain that is SPF-protected, though. Even
> > more reason to SPF-protect your domain.
> >
>
> Can we skip the discission re how effective SPF is,
> it's flaws (perceived or otherwise) and how widely
> (or not), it's been adopted?


You may. Feel free not to join in... oh, sorry, too late.

--
Peter Bowyer
Email: peter@???
Follow me on Twitter: twitter.com/peeebeee