------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=846
--- Comment #6 from Mike Cardwell <exim-users@???> 2009-04-30 11:28:42 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> I think adding new switch '/acl_headers' is overload. Exim already overloaded
> with 'small significant switch specific to this command' and read complex
> configuration - not easy.
> Headers specially added after first Recivied line, to avoid mess with DKIM
> signed headers.
> If someone really want add headers invisible to spam scaninng - just rearrange
> acl and add it later, after spam scanning command.
Adding extra config to turn on your feature isn't ideal, correct. However, all
minor revision changes should be backwards compatible or you break systems. As
I understand it, this is the way Exim updates have always happened. If we were
moving from Exim 4 to Exim 5 rather than from one version of Exim 4 to another
then yes, it would be ok, but we're not...
The majority of people don't expect upgrading from 4.69 to 4.70 to require them
to change their configuration, for things to continue to work as normal.
Mike
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugs.exim.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
