How can I redirect emails that are tagged as Spam to another MailBox as a
Quaratine .?
Thank you all in advance.From prvs=bryan.rawlins/03623acd93@??? Tue Apr 21 21:09:24 2009
Envelope-to: exim-users@???
Received: from vmail.onlymyemail.com ([216.234.108.232]:37194)
by tahini.csx.cam.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <prvs=bryan.rawlins/03623acd93@???>)
id 1LwMHP-0001Cn-E3
for exim-users@???; Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:09:24 +0100
Received: from [64.85.152.211] (helo=[10.0.1.50])
by mail.ome-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.67) (envelope-from <bryan.rawlins@???>)
id 1LwMHO-0005qL-Ac
for exim-users@???; Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:09:18 -0400
Message-ID: <49EE27E9.3050500@???>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:09:13 -0400
From: Bryan Rawlins <bryan.rawlins@???>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: exim-users@???
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--)
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL=-0.499,
BAYES_00=-1.5 autolearn=no version=3.1.8
Subject: [exim] Sender callout verification on BATV signed addresses
X-BeenThere: exim-users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: A user list for the exim MTA <exim-users.exim.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users>,
<mailto:exim-users-request@exim.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.exim.org/lurker/list/exim-users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:exim-users@exim.org>
List-Help: <mailto:exim-users-request@exim.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users>,
<mailto:exim-users-request@exim.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:09:24 -0000
It seems that BATV/PRVS is becoming more and more common in our incoming
mail stream.
http://www.exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html/spec_html/ch40.html#SECTverifyPRVS
Currently it appears that a signed return path is a rarity in UCE,
however as we all know it's probably only a matter of time before that
changes.
So my question is, and I'm strictly looking for personal opinions here;
Are callout/callback verifications on the envelope sender when that
sender is signed more acceptable than just doing them in general? I
know SCV in general is a hot topic, I don't wish to rehash it's good/bad
points, just wonder it people whom are generally against it would be
more amiable if it was only done one signed return paths.
--
Bryan Rawlins
OnlyMyEmail, Inc.
