Re: [exim] DKIM

Many thanks Phil.
That is just what I wanted and good news about the overhaul.

David

Phil Pennock wrote:
> On 2009-03-29 at 22:01 +0100, Mr David Robertson wrote:
>> To update.
>>
>> The DKIM docs say "The query string should be a domain or DKIM identity"
>> I think the option I want to use is a DKIM identity.
>> The docs do not say how this is possible.
>> It may be the i= option that I need to use.
>
> If you assume only one DKIM-Signature: header, then:
> ${sg{${extract{d}{$h_DKIM-Signature:}}}{;}{}}
> gets you the d field.
>
> The i field isn't something I've seen set yet, but that's possibly just
> a case of how little I've been looking.
>
> There are a number of known issues with Exim's current (experimental)
> DKIM support; Tom Kistner has been working on a complete overhaul,
> replacing the use of libdkim with self-contained DKIM support, designed
> for Exim. I'm eagerly awaiting the results of his work. :)
>
> -Phil
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.285 / Virus Database: 270.11.31/2028 - Release Date: 03/28/09 07:16:00
>