Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
> Ted Cooper schrieb:
>> Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
>>> I.e. google/gmail (I've no idea what it uses for signing) creates a
>>> "wrapped" DomainKey signature.
>>> So is dkim-proxy I use for signing mail with Postfix.
>> I guess that means other implementations out there can handle wrapped
>> lines. I would have been surprised if they didn't but it was/is still
>> something is double check.
>
> As I couldn't sleep because of this issue ;) I wrote a short howto on
> integrating Exim with DKIMproxy, which wraps the headers properly:
>
> http://blog.wpkg.org/2009/03/28/setting-up-dkimproxy-with-exim-for-dkim-and-domainkeys-signing/
>
> Let me know if you have any comments.
I was thinking more of patching the exim source to fix the problem :P
Most likely it will be the use of a non-wrapping print function by this
chunk of the code.
Kinda busy this weekend now but if i can fit it in I'll look at it.
--
The Exim Manual
http://www.exim.org/docs.html
http://docs.exim.org/current/