On 23 Mar 11:18, Graeme Fowler wrote: > On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 11:06 +0000, Brett Parker wrote:
> > In theory - never... however, there is a potential way to get the BCC
> > people - you get a list of envelope receipients, remove addresses that
> > exist in To: or Cc: fields and the rest are Bcc: receipients.
>
> Not true, sadly. Using the example from my previous message, it would
> appear that I was a Bcc: recipient - but I wasn't, it was a list
> expansion. This is more common than it appears, especially for large
> mailshots (for example).
I'd class that as a form of Bcc - you don't know *who* got copies of the
mail, it behaves the same as a Bcc - and some marketting "lists" are
just a set of Bcc's... ;)
