On Tue Feb 24, 2009 at 12:42:56 +0000, Jethro R Binks wrote:
> > On the other hand I've had good success rejecting messages with
> > no Date header - as that MUST be present...
>
> I've often wondered whether to bother with that. SA assigns a couple of
> points for it, but there is certainly more justification for rejecting
> outright on that basis. Nearly 500 hits on SA's MISSING_DATE rule today
I reject outright mails with no Date header, just over 1200
messages today. It's a low-tech test that is easy to perform
and has had zero false-positives or complaints to date.
Steve
--
Managed Anti-Spam Service
http://mail-scanning.com/
