Re: [exim] Envelope sender address rewriting

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Ted Cooper
Date:  
To: exim-users
Subject: Re: [exim] Envelope sender address rewriting
Christian Gregoire wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I want to add a tag before the envelope sender address (MAIL FROM). But none of the following rules works as expected :
>
> \N^<(.*@mydomain.com)>$    <TAG$1>                                 S
> \N^<(.*@mydomain.com)>$    <TAG$1>                                 F
> \N^<(.*@mydomain.com)>$    <TAG$1>                                 SF

>
> Here are the log lines for each case :
>
> Dec 16 08:52:14 gw-mail exim[10090]: 1LCUix-0002ck-MW <= TAGfrom@??? H=localhost (toto) [127.0.0.1] P=esmtp S=256
> Dec 16 08:52:16 gw-mail exim[10091]: 1LCUix-0002ck-MW ** TAGto@??? R=dnslookup T=remote_smtp: xxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Dec 16 08:53:07 gw-mail exim[10123]: 1LCUjo-0002dH-Ux <= from@??? H=localhost (toto) [127.0.0.1] P=esmtp S=252
> Dec 16 08:53:07 gw-mail exim[10124]: 1LCUjo-0002dH-Ux ** to@??? R=dnslookup T=remote_smtp: xxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Dec 16 08:54:03 gw-mail exim[10158]: 1LCUkj-0002dq-AF <= TAGfrom@??? H=localhost (toto) [127.0.0.1] P=esmtp S=256
> Dec 16 08:54:03 gw-mail exim[10159]: 1LCUkj-0002dq-AF ** TAGto@??? R=dnslookup T=remote_smtp: xxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> With either S or SF tags, both the sender and the recipient addresses are rewritten, while the F tag triggers no action.
>
>
> Any idea ?


I think the "xxxxxxxxxxx" error message might have been useful here, but
as a wild guess - are the TAGfrom@??? addresses valid? Do you
have a router that will route them?

--
The Exim Manual
http://www.exim.org/docs.html
http://docs.exim.org/current/