Where are your accept and deny statements? If they are in the RCPT ACL,
that should return a 550 error code for each failed recipient, rather then
accepting the email and generating bounce messages from within a router.
Sent by: exim-users-bounces@???
To: "exim users" <exim-users@???>
cc: (bcc: Dan Mitton/YD/RWDOE)
Subject: Re: [exim] How to not reply to bad mail
LSN: Not Relevant
User Filed as: Not a Record
But my server gets thousands of messages to non-existent local_parts
and some spammers send them all from some poor guys address (I know
I've been on the victim side of that where someone is spamming and
using my address in the from header).
I'm not only concerned that I'll be flooding that server with rejected
emails but also that my server could end up blacklisted because of the
potential flood of replies generated.
Rick
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Kjetil Torgrim Homme
<kjetilho@???> wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 17:24 -0500, Rick Duval wrote:
>> I now have a lookup that accepts emails only for addresses that are in
>> the database.
>>
>> accept condition = ${lookup mysql{SELECT count(*) from addresses \
>> WHERE active AND domain='${quote_mysql:$domain}'
\
>> AND local_part='${quote_mysql:$local_part}'}}
>>
>> deny
>>
>> It works great but I don't want to contribute to backscatter by
>> sending denial messages back to the sender everytime an address is
>> rejected. Right now it sends out and email like:
>>
>> SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO:<bob@???>:
>> host duvals.ca [74.51.38.171]: 550 5.1.1 <bob@???>:
>> Recipient address rejected: User unknown in virtual alias table
>>
>> Can I turn that off and just not have it reply at all?
>
> well, you can blackhole the message, but your current method is the
> recommended way of setting it up. if someone mistypes an address, say
> "bpb@???", you will typically want him to know about it so that he
> can resend it using the correct address.
>
> you won't be contributing to backscatter unless someone forwards e-mail
> to you -- and typoes in forwarding targets should definitely be
> reported.
>
> it's a bit different if your denial is due to a SpamAssassin score or
> something like that -- then the forwarding system may have more lax spam
> filtering than your system, but it's the forwarding's system which will
> be spreading backscatter. even here, it's not really your fault.
>
> --
> regards, | Redpill _
> Kjetil T. Homme | Linpro (_)
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for
> viruses and dangerous content by
> Accurate Anti-Spam Technologies
> and is believed to be clean.
>
>
--
## List details at
http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at
http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list -
http://wiki.exim.org/
