Dan_Mitton@??? schrieb:
> I think I like #1 better, but I'm not sure.
Me too :)
> I was hoping that the maintainer's of this code might have some additional
> insight and could possibly point me at other places where endian'ness
> might be an issue.
I'll fix this tonight, and do a quick check on the rest of the code, but
I guess that's all there is to it. Not much more byte-pushing going on
in there.
