Re: [exim] def:acl var with strict_acl_vars=true

Brian Blood wrote:
> On Oct 27, 2008, at 6:49 PM, Brian Blood wrote:
>
>> On Oct 27, 2008, at 3:23 PM, W B Hacker wrote:
>>
>>>> acl_ variables aren't defined in the message generated by the
>>>> autoreply transport driver
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Nor can they be.
>>>
>>> The router/transport chain has ONLY read-access to acl_m variables.
>>
>> I didn't say they weren't readable/writable, I'm saying they don't
>> exist for the message generated by the autoreply transport driver.
>
>
> Good reason for this...
>
> I don't have ANY acls setup for not_smtp type connections....
>

That's was sort of where I was trying to steer you .. setting up
beforehand in an acl.

Though I hadn't twigged to it being non-smtp...primarily 'coz I go to
extreme lengths to not allow non_smtp anyway....

> That'll teach me to think!
>
> Brian
>
>

LOL!

Running an MTA requires a willingness to accumulate scar-tissue on one's
nether parts.

;-)

Bill