Ian Eiloart wrote:
>
> --On 8 October 2008 00:06:24 +0800 W B Hacker <wbh@???> wrote:
>
>>> I favour XPRDR technically (strict timeouts enable tarpitting without
>>> losing compliant hosts, for example),
>> Not sure that cannot be done 'easily enough' anyway... and w/o overly
>> relying on timeouts.
>
> The problem is that some M$ clients time out earlier than some spambots.
The m$ clients wouldn't be using these new protocols would they? They
would be in the good old SMTP(AUTH) submission mode.
These new extras would be advertised to everyone but only an MTA that
knew what to do with them would take up the offer.
--
The Exim Manual
http://www.exim.org/docs.html
http://docs.exim.org/current/
