Auteur: Philip Hazel Date: À: 167 CC: exim-dev Sujet: Re: [exim-dev] [Bug 167] Make "true" and "false" valid expansion
conditions
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, Phil Pennock wrote:
> I think, on balance, at present I'm opposed to bool:varname as an expansion
> condition; a reasoned use-case for why we need it, or why it's cleaner, or
> strong support for bool:varname from someone like TF, NM or PH will see me
> provide a revised patch, but for now I stand by the current version (v2).
I'm with you. Quite apart from inventing a new syntax, if you have
bool:varname, you can test only one variable, whereas if you have
bool{...} the ... can be any arbitrary expansion string.
