Dave Lugo wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Sep 2008, Martin A. Brooks wrote:
>
>> Whilst you're certainly probably right with your assertion here, nothing
>> in RFC2821 seems to mandate the client hanging round to issue a QUIT
>> after a message has been accepted by the server.
>>
>>
>
> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2821.txt
>
> 4.1.1.10 QUIT (QUIT)
>
> This command specifies that the receiver MUST send an OK reply, and
> then close the transmission channel.
>
> The receiver MUST NOT intentionally close the transmission channel
> until it receives and replies to a QUIT command (even if there was an
> error). The sender MUST NOT intentionally close the transmission
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> channel until it sends a QUIT command and SHOULD wait until it
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> receives the reply
Woo, I suck at reading. Thanks.
--
Martin A. Brooks | http://www.antibodymx.net/ | Anti-spam& anti-virus
Consultant | martin@??? | filtering. Inoculate
antibodymx.net | m: +447792493388 | your mail system.
