Re: [exim] I've modified Erik Mugele's exim_surbl.pl utility…

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Dave Lugo
Date:  
To: exim-users
Subject: Re: [exim] I've modified Erik Mugele's exim_surbl.pl utility for blocking URIBL in Exim
On Mon, 15 Sep 2008, Martin A. Brooks wrote:
>
> Whilst you're certainly probably right with your assertion here, nothing
> in RFC2821 seems to mandate the client hanging round to issue a QUIT
> after a message has been accepted by the server.
>


http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2821.txt

4.1.1.10 QUIT (QUIT)

This command specifies that the receiver MUST send an OK reply, and
then close the transmission channel.

The receiver MUST NOT intentionally close the transmission channel
until it receives and replies to a QUIT command (even if there was an
error). The sender MUST NOT intentionally close the transmission
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
channel until it sends a QUIT command and SHOULD wait until it
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
receives the reply

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------
Dave Lugo   dlugo@???    LC Unit #260   TINLC
Have you hugged your firewall today?   No spam, thanks.
--------------------------------------------------------
Are you the police?  . . . .  No ma'am, we're sysadmins.