On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Tony Finch <dot@???> wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Aug 2008, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
>>
>> Now, running `exim -bt` is an issue ....
>> How do I circumvent this?
>
> Use the address_test precondition. You might need two routers, one for
> testing mode and one for normal mode.
Eeh? I did not understand that. Could you please elaborate?
>> 2008-08-07 11:50:10 1KR1C3-000KNF-MB failed to unlink
>> /var/spool/exim/msglog/3/1KR1C3-000KNF-MB
>>
>> Is this some race condition?
>
> It might be because the message log is never being created in the first
> place. Do you ever get "Couldn't open message log" errors? If not, the
> patch below might provide enlightenment.
>
> --- src/deliver.c 22 Aug 2007 14:20:28 -0000 1.45
> +++ src/deliver.c 7 Aug 2008 11:10:33 -0000
> @@ -6554,7 +6554,8 @@
> else
> {
> if (Uunlink(spoolname) < 0)
> - log_write(0, LOG_MAIN|LOG_PANIC_DIE, "failed to unlink %s", spoolname);
> + log_write(0, LOG_MAIN|LOG_PANIC_DIE, "failed to unlink %s: %s",
> + spoolname, strerror(errno));
> }
> }
I have to answer this after another couple of hours.... after I get
the messages again...
--
Best regards,
Odhiambo WASHINGTON,
Nairobi,KE
+254733744121/+254722743223
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
"Oh My God! They killed init! You Bastards!"
--from a /. post
