Re: [exim] Should queue processing be rewritten in Exim?

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Marc Perkel
Date:  
To: exim-users
Subject: Re: [exim] Should queue processing be rewritten in Exim?


Todd Lyons wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 09:46:13AM +0200, Angel Marin wrote:
>
>
>> If you have tons of cash to spare you can try HyperDrive
>> (http://www.hyperossystems.co.uk/). It claims 0.0011ms seek time and
>> 16GB support.
>>
>
>
> And if you have multiples of those tons of cash, go up to 504 GB worth
> of DRAM storage, connected by external PCI Express. It claims 3
> microseconds (0.003 ms) seek time, which is more than the HyperDrive
> above, however at 1/2 Terabyte, there's an obvious size advantage.
>
> http://www.violin-memory.com/products/violin1010.html
>
> Imagine throwing this on an Oracle box and putting the redo logs on it.
>
> It also can use Flash memory which nets you 5 TB of storage but at flash
> memory speeds.  It does not seem to have any kind of battery backup.
> - -- 
> Regards...        Todd
> When engineers want simple solutions to complicated social problems,
> freedom is the first victim...                      --Stephane Bortzmeyer
> Linux kernel 2.6.24-18-generic   7 users,  load average: 0.13, 0.07, 0.05

>
>


Thanks todd. That's a little too much. Probably a pci card with 8 gigs
of ram would be what I'm really looking for.