Re: [exim] Should queue processing be rewritten in Exim?

Top Page
This message is part of the following thread:
M+++\the complete thread tree sorted by date
MMMMMMartin A. Brooks at <-
.MMMMarc Perkel at ->
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Adam Nielsen
Date:  
To: Marc Perkel
CC: exim-user
Subject: Re: [exim] Should queue processing be rewritten in Exim?
> Ideally if I had a battery back up ram disk card that would be ideal
> but I can't find that anywhere.

What about a Gigabyte i-RAM? It has a maximum size of 4GB, but that's a
big e-mail queue...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I-RAM

It uses DDR RAM, has a 16-hour backup battery and connects to a SATA
port. Because of that it is limited to 150MB/sec, but it does have a
0.1ms seek time.

Cheers,
Adam.

This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
Exim-users
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-Re: [exim] Should queue processing be rewritten in Exim?Re: [exim] Should queue processing be rewritten in Exim?->
Tahini and Hummus and Cumin Development Archives administrated by cumin AdminsLurker (version 2.3)