Re: [exim] Should queue processing be rewritten in Exim?

On 02/07/2008, Marc Perkel <marc@???> wrote:
> Suppose Exim had 2 queues instead of one. We'll call the first queue the
> primary queue which is a ram drive and the secondary queue which is a
> disk drive. All this is of course optional and user settable.

You're proposing a solution before defining the requirements. What's
the high-level use case here?

Peter

--
Peter Bowyer
Email: peter@???
Follow me on Twitter: twitter.com/peeebeee