Philip Hazel wrote: > I took a *very* quick look. One thing that struck me was that there
> would be fewer changes, and the performance would be less impacted, if
> instead of adding the mm argument to the match() function, you added an
> extra field to the match_data structure. That is generally where
> "static" data for the functions is placed.
> Thanks, I did as you said. At least NO_RECURSE is fixed now ;)
