Re: [exim] BATV configuration

--On 4 June 2008 13:55:58 +0100 Tony Finch <dot@???> wrote:

> On Wed, 4 Jun 2008, Jethro R Binks wrote:
>>
>> It is a while since I looked at what Exim did, but as I recall there were
>> two main ways of generating an auto-reply. One was using the "vacation"
>> command in a filter, whch by default uses $reply_address (== "From:", or
>> "Reply-To"). The other is the autoreply transport, which takes a "to"
>> option which has no default, so leaves it up to the user to make the
>> choice of address to use.
>
> They both use the same code.
>
> I'm thinking of fixing Exim to be conformant to RFC 3834 by default.

Configurability would be nice.

> Tony.
> --
> <fanf@???> <dot@???> http://dotat.at/ ${sg{\N${sg{\
> N\}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}\
> \N}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}



--
Ian Eiloart
IT Services, University of Sussex
x3148