Re: [exim] BATV configuration

Página Inicial
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Autor: Tony Finch
Data:  
Para: Jethro R Binks
CC: exim-users
Assunto: Re: [exim] BATV configuration
On Wed, 4 Jun 2008, Jethro R Binks wrote:
>
> It is a while since I looked at what Exim did, but as I recall there were
> two main ways of generating an auto-reply. One was using the "vacation"
> command in a filter, whch by default uses $reply_address (== "From:", or
> "Reply-To"). The other is the autoreply transport, which takes a "to"
> option which has no default, so leaves it up to the user to make the
> choice of address to use.


They both use the same code.

I'm thinking of fixing Exim to be conformant to RFC 3834 by default.

Tony.
--
<fanf@???> <dot@???> http://dotat.at/ ${sg{\N${sg{\
N\}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}\
\N}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}