Hello Tony,
Tony Finch <dot@???> (Do 08 Mai 2008 13:49:10 CEST):
> On Thu, 8 May 2008, Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
> >
> > Does exist some standard (RFC) saying that it's fatal mistake to have no
> > A record for the first MX?
>
> The relevant spec is section 5 of RFC 2821. It isn't very good :-(
> The draft revision of the spec is better: see
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt
>
> I think since only one out of three MX records for your domain are broken,
> it is not reasonable to reject the message entirely. RFC 2821 says "If MX
> records are present, but none of them are usable, this situation MUST be
> reported as an error." (note the "none")
Thank you.
Best regards from Dresden
Viele Grüße aus Dresden
Heiko Schlittermann
--
SCHLITTERMANN.de ---------------------------- internet & unix support -
Heiko Schlittermann HS12-RIPE -----------------------------------------
gnupg encrypted messages are welcome - key ID: 48D0359B ---------------
gnupg fingerprint: 3061 CFBF 2D88 F034 E8D2 7E92 EE4E AC98 48D0 359B -
