On Wed, 30 Apr 2008, Renaud Allard wrote:
>
> This further confirms my example 1 as some people are caching DNS much
> more than they should as my 2 servers static IPs have been removed from
> sorbs for weeks:
Er, what?
/greps sorbs' soa out of the logfile ...
Apr 27 04:31:13 severe rbldnsd[490]: combined:dnsbl.sorbs.net_rbldnsd: 20080427 083034: subzones=20 datasets=14
Apr 27 23:31:02 severe rbldnsd[490]: combined:dnsbl.sorbs.net_rbldnsd: 20080428 033043: subzones=20 datasets=14
Apr 28 04:30:58 severe rbldnsd[490]: combined:dnsbl.sorbs.net_rbldnsd: 20080428 083037: subzones=20 datasets=14
Apr 28 23:31:47 severe rbldnsd[490]: combined:dnsbl.sorbs.net_rbldnsd: 20080429 033043: subzones=20 datasets=14
Apr 29 04:30:44 severe rbldnsd[490]: combined:dnsbl.sorbs.net_rbldnsd: 20080429 083027: subzones=20 datasets=14
Apr 29 23:31:33 severe rbldnsd[490]: combined:dnsbl.sorbs.net_rbldnsd: 20080430 033047: subzones=20 datasets=14
Apr 30 04:31:29 severe rbldnsd[490]: combined:dnsbl.sorbs.net_rbldnsd: 20080430 083025: subzones=20 datasets=14
Your complaint appears to be with SORBS, not ...
>
> This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
>
> A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
> recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
>
> dlugo@???
> SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO:<dlugo@???>:
> host mail.etherboy.com [216.158.54.130]: 550-rejected:
> 206.251.244.95 is listed in dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net
> 550 Dynamic IP Addresses See:
> http://www.sorbs.net/lookup.shtml?206.251.244.95
>
... me :)
No cc of list mail needed, thanks ;)
(and I've added a WL entry here for you, just in case)
--
--------------------------------------------------------
Dave Lugo dlugo@??? LC Unit #260 TINLC
Have you hugged your firewall today? No spam, thanks.
--------------------------------------------------------
Are you the police? . . . . No ma'am, we're sysadmins.
