Re: [exim] Greylisting again.

On Mon, 2008-04-28 at 09:36 -0400, Marc Sherman wrote:
> > (Also, rejecting for SPF fail is particularly 'brave'. I'd recommend
> > googling for 'sender address forgery' and reading the first link that
> > Google shows up.)
>
> I'm on your side here, but don't you think demonstrating your own google
> rank is a bit disingenuous? :)

I didn't think so, no. Is it misleading in any way? Perhaps if it was
intended to hide the fact that I wrote the page in question, I
suppose... but given the hostname in the URL (and the examples, and the
address at the bottom, etc.), I think that would be a little hard to
achieve. And even then, why would it matter who wrote it?

Maybe it could be construed as being a little egotistical, but is it
really any worse than using the host name 'david.woodhou.se'? :)

Besides, at least if I cite the google search, they can get to the snake
oil site too -- that's hits 2 and 3 iirc.

--
dwmw2