Marten Lehmann wrote:
> In some cases there is no choice. You won't find an open source virus
> scanner that beats or nearly reaches the same detection rates and comes
> with heuristic that the world leaders Kaspersky and Symantec do. And
> similar, you don't find an out-of-the-box spamfilter that has zero false
> positives and a high detection rate for ISPs like eXpurgate (thats the
> name of our solution). If you have ever worked with SpamAssassin, you
> would know that it is no possible to use it with a good detection rate
> without of much regular manual work and configuration for 500.000
> messages and more a day per mx server.
>
Is it that good if it doesn't even support the basic things like rbl
testing and greylisting?
Furthermore, the only spamfilter that has zero false positives is a
disabled spamfilter, even humans make mistakes. And if you use rbls and
greylisting, how can you be sure you will still have the alleged 0 false
positives?
Furthermore, exim supports scanning with Kaspersky.
