chris burgess wrote:
> Once we set up routing for -bounce@ourdomain, it was obvious that all list
> messages have a sender envelope of -bounces@ourdomain. So I've had to modify
> my conditions. The router errors_via_isp below is intended to look for
> Mailman traffic which originates from the list, by comparing the envelope
> sender and From: headers.
>
> If those match, then the email should be handed to the ISP mailserver. (Our
> aim is to use our mailserver for handling priority mail rather than bounced
> spam.)
>
> The config below seems to work, but I'd appreciate any critique or
> suggestions.
>
> Thanks for your help so far!
>
> ############################
> # domain lists
>
> domainlist local_domains = @ : \
> @[] : \
> lists.ourdomain.com
>
> domainlist route_via_isp = ourisp.com : isphosted.com : hotmail.com
>
> ############################
> # routers
>
> ##
> ## route these domains to ISP directly
> ##
> smarthost_isp:
> driver = manualroute
> domains = +route_via_isp
> route_list = * smtp.ourisp.com bydns
> transport = remote_smtp
>
> ##
> ## divert automatically generated mail via isp, so spam bounces don't mar
> ## our reputation
> ##
lol
> errors_via_isp:
> driver = manualroute
> senders = ^.*-request@.* : \
> ^.*-bounces@.* : \
> ^.*-bounces+.*@.* : \
> ^.*-confirm+.*@.* : \
> ^.*-join@.* : \
> ^.*-leave@.* : \
> ^.*-owner@.* : \
> ^.*-request@.* : \
> ^.*-admin@.* : \
> ^owner-.*@.*:\
> ^postmaster@.*:\
> ^webmaster@.*:\
> ^listmaster@.*:\
> ^mailer-daemon@.*:\
> ^root@.*
> condition = ${if eq {$sender_address} {$h_from:} {yes} {no}}
> route_list = * smtp.ourisp.com bydns
> transport = remote_smtp
>
> ##
> ## route most normal mail to our server for delivery
> ##
> smarthost_ourdomain:
> driver = manualroute
> domains = ! +local_domains
> route_list = * smtp.ourdomain.com bydns
> transport = remote_smtp
>
> ##
> ## direct delivery (only if the above fail)
> ##
> dnslookup:
> driver = dnslookup
> domains = ! +local_domains
> transport = remote_smtp
> ignore_target_hosts = 0.0.0.0 : 127.0.0.0/8
> no_more
>
> #
> ############################
The last router has the exact same conditions on it as the previous one.
I don't think it will ever be hit so you can probably ditch it.
Shouldn't be causing any problems anyway
--
The Exim Manual
http://www.exim.org/docs.html
http://docs.exim.org/current/
