Re: [exim] absolute value of integer "16777215K" is too larg…

Pàgina inicial
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Autor: W B Hacker
Data:  
A: exim users
Assumpte: Re: [exim] absolute value of integer "16777215K" is too large (overflow)
Gregory Machin wrote:
> Hi, how do I fix this the error below .. I'm getting it occasionally and
> would like to resolve it .. is it exim that is complaining about
> the "absolute value of integer "16777215K" is too large (overflow)" or
> mysql ?
>
>
> 2008-03-28 07:18:11 [18245] failed to expand condition "${if
> >{$message_size}{${lookup mysql{select users.maxmsgsize from
> users,domains where localpart = '${quote_mysql:$local_part}' and domain
> = '${quote_mysql:$domain}' and users.maxmsgsize > 0 and
> users.domain_id=domains.domain_id }{${value}K}fail}} {yes}{no}}" for
> ditch_maxmsgsize router: absolute value of integer "16777215K" is too
> large (overflow)
> 2008-03-28 07:18:23 [18262] 1Jf6yi-0004kH-EP failed to expand condition
> "${if >{$message_size}{${lookup mysql{select users.maxmsgsize from
> users,domains where localpart = '${quote_mysql:$local_part}' and domain
> = '${quote_mysql:$domain}' and users.maxmsgsize > 0 and
> users.domain_id=domains.domain_id }{${value}K}fail}} {yes}{no}}" for
> ditch_maxmsgsize router: absolute value of integer "16777215K" is too
> large (overflow)
>
> thanks
>


Not sure it matters (which is complaining).

Seems *daft* to allow 16GB max message sizes.... they'll time-out unless
you have GigE end-to-end AND a fast server & fs.

Why not set a more realistic limit? Our largest - custom commercial
installations only - is 800 MB - just over one CD's worth.

Anything larger needs an scp/sftp account.

Or FedEx/DHL/TNT et al...

YMMV,

Bill