Author: Jeroen van Aart Date: To: exim-users Subject: Re: [exim] heartbeat load balancing and exim
Thanks both for some very helpful information. Yes I understand I am
mixing HA and load balancing, but they do somewhat overlap. In that load
balancing also causes HA. Since if a server fails there will not be any
downtime, as long as there are other servers still up.
Christian Recktenwald wrote:
> To get the idea think of two SMTP listeners just receiving
> mail and instantly writing them to a common storage.
The common storage part would become an additional weak link, since it
introduces something one tried to eliminate, a single point of failure.
Also I am not sure also how well exim would work with something like NFS.
> different priority. Any of them may fail without causing
> interruption of service. No additional LB or HA setup needed
> here. (For POP/IMAP it's not as easy.)
I agree yes. NFS for example introduces more trouble than it solves in
the case of pop/imap.