Tom Brown wrote:
> Hi
>
> I wonder what people think for a RAID level for their mail stores?
>
> I can only have RAID 1 or RAID 5 and i dont have many users ~500 so what
> do people think? This will be on a hardware RAID card but the RAID
> channel will not be dedicated to the mail store ie there will be another
> RAID disk sharing the channel.
>
> Just want to lay the spindles out 'correctly'
>
> thanks
>
>
We consider RAID1 a practical necessity. Not just for mailstore, but
servers in general - anything but a laptop, really.
- with current HDD sizes - very affordable 500 GB, 750 GB, even 1 TB
there is not as much need for RAID5 unless you have a truly massive
storage need.
- RAID1 (usually) reads faster, isn't all that much slower on writes,
given that they are usually buffered/background - even aged or 'lazy'
writes anyway.
It is also easy to implement with anything from top-end 'hardware'
controllers thru el-cheapo psuedo-RAID or even all-software - one or
more 'flavors' of such being supported by most OS.
- RAID5, OTOH, really should have a good 'hardware' controller, and it
is not easy to cost-justify the better ones vs the 'waste' of rather
cheap HDD needed for a RAID1 mirror.
In either case - don't neglect backups.
RAID cannot protect against fire, theft, malicious damage, controller or
driver foibles - or more commonly - a mere lapse in attention that
mirrors a new, blank HDD onto the one with good data instead of the
other way 'round...
:-(
Bill
--
## List details at
http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at
http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list -
http://wiki.exim.org/
