Nigel Metheringham wrote:
> On 21 Feb 2008, at 16:14, Yves Goergen wrote:
>
>> On 21.02.2008 14:16 CE(S)T, Nigel Metheringham wrote:
>>> [ Nigel Metheringham
>>> Nigel.Metheringham@??? ]
>> Oops, you're listed yourself at rfc-ignorant. I guess you don't take
>> that service for real, too, hm? ;)
>
>
> Hmm... thats sort of embarrassing. In mitigation:-
> - the evidence related to that shows its symantec (outsourced
> spam/malware scanning service) that bounced it. I knew there
> was a reason we dumped them (other than their spam scanning
> being crap).
> - this is no longer the case at present
> - I don't actually use that domain myself....
> - I'll fix the rfc-ignorant entries shortly
>
AFAIK, people at rfc-ignorant generally "manually" verify the entries
before validating them. So if you do accept postmaster, that's quite
strange.
