Re: [exim] Extrange behavior with smarthost and routers

Αρχική Σελίδα
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Συντάκτης: Jonathan GF
Ημερομηνία:  
Προς: exim-users
Αντικείμενο: Re: [exim] Extrange behavior with smarthost and routers
Hi Dave,

first of all i have to say that...yes.. i was? obfuscated. I tried to post
as much information as posible and i only casused noise. You got reason.

What i tried to state in the previous mail is that, even if the smarthost
works, and the server behind works also, the bold lines shows an anormal
activity.

The logs, without the bold lines represent a normal behavior:

Gmail -> smarthost -> server    (and vice-versa)


But the bold lines show something like this:

Gmail -> smarthost -> server -> call back to the smarthost     (let see the
lines again)


2008-02-04 01:05:48 H=mail.surestorm.com [89.128.3.108] F=<> rejected RCPT <
jonathangf@???>: Relay Not Permitted
2008-02-04 01:05:48 unexpected disconnection while reading SMTP command from
mail.surestorm.com [89.128.3.108]

This lines appears in the smarthost log, so it tell me the server, after put
the message in the correct inbox tried something else. This sounds to me
lika a loop.....What do you think?

Cheers,

Jonathan GF



On Feb 4, 2008 9:47 PM, Dave Evans <exim-users-20071221@???> wrote:

> Firstly, please carefully read http://wiki.exim.org/DontObfuscate ,
> including
> the "Why was I sent this URL?" section.
>
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 09:29:58PM +0100, Jonathan GF wrote:
> > Unless the architecture work i can see weird messages in the logs,
> something
> > i want to fix because they sound like a loop between the exim smarthost
> and
> > exim mail server.
>
> Doesn't look like that to me. To me, it looks like the smarthost receives
> the
> message <a50c1e90802031605p2bf68fd1l26e54a85b7216a0e@???> from
> 66.249.82.231; it sends the message to 89.128.3.108 using the
> send_to_mailserver router. The mail server then receives the message
> (from
> 64.79.209.162), and sends it to a maildir (virtual_user router).
>
> Is that not what's meant to be happening? If not, please try explaining
> again
> what the problem is (and take heed of the advice on DontObfuscate).
> Thanks!
>
> --
> Dave Evans
> http://djce.org.uk/
> http://djce.org.uk/pgpkey
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFHp3nqnYOJTU6nkkkRAv90AJ0fT64cYEc+alXyiZHHCOMdSjs8YACfbDSB
> nSF50kDb1Y5MvF8+l/C9re4=
> =d9q4
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> --
> ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
> ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
> ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
>