fanf2 2008/01/28 18:30:29 GMT
Modified files:
exim-doc/doc-docbook spec.xfpt
Log:
Bugzilla 663: explain that $spam_score and $spam_score_int may appear to disagree.
Revision Changes Path
1.30 +3 -1 exim/exim-doc/doc-docbook/spec.xfpt
Index: spec.xfpt
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/exim/exim-doc/doc-docbook/spec.xfpt,v
retrieving revision 1.29
retrieving revision 1.30
diff -u -r1.29 -r1.30
--- spec.xfpt 17 Jan 2008 13:10:37 -0000 1.29
+++ spec.xfpt 28 Jan 2008 18:30:29 -0000 1.30
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-. $Cambridge: exim/exim-doc/doc-docbook/spec.xfpt,v 1.29 2008/01/17 13:10:37 nm4 Exp $
+. $Cambridge: exim/exim-doc/doc-docbook/spec.xfpt,v 1.30 2008/01/28 18:30:29 fanf2 Exp $
.
. /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
. This is the primary source of the Exim Manual. It is an xfpt document that is
@@ -28104,7 +28104,9 @@
.vitem &$spam_score_int$&
The spam score of the message, multiplied by ten, as an integer value. For
-example &"34"& or &"305"&. This is useful for numeric comparisons in
+example &"34"& or &"305"&. It may appear to disagree with &$spam_score$&
+because &$spam_score$& is rounded and &$spam_score_int$& is truncated.
+The integer value is useful for numeric comparisons in
conditions. This variable is special; its value is saved with the message, and
written to Exim's spool file. This means that it can be used during the whole
life of the message on your Exim system, in particular, in routers or
