Re: [exim] Out of Office and collateral spam

On Wed, 19 Dec 2007, Patrick von der Hagen wrote:

| And if Richard was rejecting suspected spam, he would have little reason
| to worry about OoO in the first place.

We reject spam where we can identify it. But the real problem is when
spam slips through the filter, and the recipient has enabled OoO.

We still worry about the collateral spam this generates!