Re: [exim] verify = header_syntax unreliable?

On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 10:16:15PM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> I'm having something of a hard time at the moment tracking down this
> problem... but what I've found so far seems to indicate that Exim 4.62
> and 4.63 has some really odd behaviour.

Forget this; I realised that, of course, when 'bouncing' the message
back to the local MTA, it qualified the unqualified address, resulting
in a perfectly legal CC header. <grumble>.

--
Russell King