On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 03:01:44PM +0100, tropfstein@??? said:
> > A word of warning, vacation messages are sent (by Exim, for example) to
> > addresses found in headers, not the return-path. BATV will cause these to
> > fail.
>
> I assume that vacation messages contain a sender. BATV just applies
> for mails with an empty sender what is true for bounces only
I hope you assume wrong. Imagine the loop of competing vacation
messages when they don't use a null sender ...
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Stephen Gran | The state law of Pennsylvania prohibits |
| steve@??? | singing in the bathtub. |
| http://www.lobefin.net/~steve | |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
