Re: [exim] BATV implementation generates paniclog if sender…

--On 11 December 2007 11:23:31 +0100 tropfstein@??? wrote:

> I figured it out now:
>
> I didn't implement the ACL in the data section because I thought it's
> useless ;-)
> If you follow http://www.exim-users.org/forums/showthread.php?t=51895
> one by one, BATV will work flawless.
>

A word of warning, vacation messages are sent (by Exim, for example) to
addresses found in headers, not the return-path. BATV will cause these to
fail.

--
Ian Eiloart
IT Services, University of Sussex
x3148