Re: [exim] exim_surbl

Stephen Gran wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 06:53:42PM +0000, W B Hacker said:
>> Why wait until acl_smtp_data and invoke a perl script to do what Exim can do
>> with much less workload in the acl_smtp_connect phase?
>
> SURBL and URIBL are not what you think they are.

Perhaps not.

Can your tell me how they differ from the same-named ones included in SpamAssassin?

Bill