In message <47333B13.7070401@???>, Bryan Rawlins <bryan.rawl
ins@???> writes
>Total:
>122383 Spam
>32594 Ham
>
>No TLS/SSL:
>122383 Spam
>27057 Ham
>
>TLS/SSL:
>1064 Spam
>5537 Ham
>
>My $0.02, It appears to be a useful as an indicator to influence an
>overall score (eg. spammassassin), but as with many other things it
>doesn't appear to be good for making an absolute decision based on just
>this information.
I suspect you are mainly measuring the performance of filters (or of
mitigation of compromised hosts) at other ISP's sites.
viz: the email doesn't originate at the machine that is using TLS, but
one hop further back.
>sslv3:aes256-sha:256
>23 Spam
>39 Ham
hence the variation between the ciphers, you're now picking out very
small numbers of senders and measuring their performance at not sending
you spam from their customers.
- --
richard Richard Clayton
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin
