Re: [exim] "acl_not_smtp" ratelimit

On 9 Oct 2007, at 15:49, Dean Brooks wrote:
> Make sense that this would be the proper behavior though. per_rcpt
> implies increment per each recipient, so I guess I can see why it
> might not be clarified in the docs.

Care to suggest a form of words that would improve the docs - add to
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=613

Cheers
    Nigel.

--
[ Nigel Metheringham           Nigel.Metheringham@??? ]
[ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ]