I didn't see it was useless, as the only chage was an IP address. I also
disagree with the wiki page. Some of the systems I deal with contain
protectively marked IP addresses which would be inappropriate to reproduced
here - does that mean I shouldn't ask for help with Exim because I can't
post my log lines in full ?
In any case.. It seems to me that Exim had either "forgotten" it had
delivered the message the first time, or 2 processes tried to deliver it.
Are your mail spools on any kind of file system that could have locking
issues ? Maybe the queue runner was unaware that the message was being dealt
with by another process.
-Andy-
-----Original Message-----
From: John Jetmore [
mailto:jj33@pobox.com]
Sent: 03 October 2007 17:32
To: Neil Sproston
Cc: exim-users@???
Subject: Re: [exim] Duplicate mail deliveries.
I generally think people are too harsh in their responses about not
obfuscating logs, but in this case it seems possible that you obfuscated
into uselessness
If you hadn't posted those logs my advice to you would have been to look at
the headers of the two messages and see where they diverge, especially the
Received headers. That may still be good advice.
Please read
http://wiki.exim.org/DontObfuscate and consider posting your
logs again without obfuscation.
