John Robinson wrote:
> I know people disapprove of the use of port 465, but since it's the only
> way of getting some MS Outlook versions to do SSL/TLS at all, I consider
What is wrong with port 465? Isn't it the default smtp over ssl port?
grep 465 /etc/services
ssmtp 465/tcp smtps # SMTP over SSL
> it a necessary evil. Blame Microsoft.
Of course blaming that company, even at random, is often a safe bet. ;-)
Regards,
Jeroen