On 2007-07-23 10:36, Mike Cardwell wrote:
> Jürgen Herz wrote:
>
> > I wrote that I also added a similar lookup in acl_not_smtp. I guess I
> > wasn't clear that I also populate acl_c0 there with the same values.
> > Might it be that the local_parts fails because exim doesn't have a local
> > part in this situation?
>
> In acl_not_smtp there is no $local_part and no $domain defined, because
> there can potentially be multiple recipients and that acl is run only
> once. $recipients contains a comma separated list of the recipients.
Uh, indeed. So I'm now usin acl_m0 instead of $local_part there where
set acl_m0 = ${local_part:$recipients}
In my environment I'm sure that mail is only inserted by SMTP or by
bouncing, so it should be fairly save that $recipients only hold one
recipient, no?
> This can't be done in acl_not_smtp nor the routers so what I
> did was create a router:
>
> reroute_locally:
> driver = manualroute
> domains = ! +local_domains
> condition = ${if eq{$interface_address}{}}
> transport = remote_smtp
> route_list = * "127.0.0.1"
> self = send
> no_verify
>
> That way, even locally generated mail ends up passing through the
> "normal" acl's
Thanks, that's an interesting approach.
Since my above approach seems to work now, I'll not try that, but keep
it in my mind.
Bye,
Juergen
