Marc Sherman wrote:
> [I changed the subject because this is not a continuation of the part of
> the thread that was getting acrimonious]
>
> Jeremy Harris wrote:
>> Without knowing for sure what mails are spam and what are ham,
>> we reject connections:
>> 10% rdns + 2mx
>> 35% helo
>> 5% dnsbl
>> 20% conn-dropped during delays
>> 10% no such user
>> 3% sender-verify
>
> I'm curious -- what's that first criteria "rdns + 2mx"? Do you require
> any sending site to have at least 2 mx's configured?
No, that's a connection to a secondary of ours (and
the primary being up), where
the connection has bad reverse-dns.
Cheers,
Jeremy
