Re: [exim] "temporarily rejected after DATA" sincemovingserv…

Pàgina inicial
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Autor: John Clement
Data:  
A: Thomas Jacob, exim-users
Assumptes vells: Re: [exim] "temporarily rejected after DATA" since movingservertoa new office.
Assumpte: Re: [exim] "temporarily rejected after DATA" sincemovingservertoa new office.
All day my colleagues have been troubleshooting random connectivity
issues, and it hadn't occured to me that this might be related to that.
Now that you say it, it does make some sense. I'm going to wait now
until they've sorted out the network and keep fingers crossed that it is
indeed the ify network causing this and not something specific to the
mail server (which would make sense since nothing has changed on that
server)

Thanks for the help,

I'll let you know the outcome,

cheers - jc

> -----Original Message-----
> From: exim-users-bounces@???
> [mailto:exim-users-bounces@exim.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Jacob
> Sent: 25 June 2007 18:31
> To: exim-users@???
> Subject: Re: [exim] "temporarily rejected after DATA"
> sincemoving server toa new office.
>
> If the problem occurs for incoming connections, and you are
> using some sort of port fowarding via your NAT-address to get
> the actual TCP/IP connection to your mail server, maybe your
> NAT router setup is randomly dropping (incoming) connections.
> Some low quality hardware does this for incoming connections
> (I still own such a device myself).
>
> That should create a temporary problem during the data part,
> but there should probably be messages in your logs about lost
> connections then.
>
> Or maybe your exim is configured to do certain things in the
> data acl and those somehow fail?
>
> On Mon, 2007-06-25 at 18:11 +0100, John Clement wrote:
> > Thanks for the reply, this is all relating to incoming mail for our
> > domain. I agree the MX config is more than a little
> unusual. The 1st
> > and last entries are are a dummy entry, from what I
> understand this is
> > to reduce the amount of spam we receive (the way the guy
> that set it
> > up this way explained it to me is spammers usually hit the
> first mail
> > server, find its down and give up), moving onto the real
> servers one
> > is the actual server (that we've got the problem with -
> mx3) and the
> > other two are servers that just forward to mx3.
> >
> > Any more thoughts?
> >
> > thanks - jc
>
>
>
> --
> ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
> ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
> ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
>